Jump to content

User talk:Vanished user 4783516

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, ElectionsGeek, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -🐦Do☭torWho42 () 08:46, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

[edit]

Hello, I'm DrStrauss. I noticed that in this edit to Windham County, Connecticut, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DrStrauss talk 21:27, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Toast sandwich

[edit]

-🐦Do☭torWho42 () 22:09, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Could you update something please?

[edit]

Hi, just wanted to let you know. I have created a page for the 1900 election in Florida and could you update the table on each county for me. I also like that you have helped create a table for each counties election results which is really useful than just having it go back to 1960. Skim

Thank you for doing that for me!

[edit]

Just want to say thank you! -Skim127

[edit]

Thanks, ElectionsGeek for putting in the precise Presidential vote for each county – it is really valuable information!

However, I wonder if – at least where feasible – you could direct the links for each county’s results not to the general website for each election, but to the election in the relevant state. I will link to my redirect for Sebastian County, Arkansas to illustrate what I would like to be done to the basic election tables.

(In cases where no article exists, I do not desire such changes, as you should gather from the Sebastian County edit).

There are three further changes I would also appreciate:

  1. If a major party candidate is not on the ballot (as occurred in some states in 1892, 1912, 1948 and 1964 – see my edit for Wilcox County to see what I want done), or if there were no non-write-in third party candidates, then would it be possible to delete the coloured column as seen for 1948 and 1964?
  2. If a third-party wins a county (as in 1892, 1912, 1924, 1948 and 1968), would it be possible to provide full party shading, as seen for my Winston County edit?
  3. In some cases in 1892, 1912, 1920, and 1924, multiple third parties combined for more votes than any single major party, but no third party won as many votes as the leading major party. Needed changes (for mere precision) are illustrated with my edit for Prowers County, Colorado.

Thanks nonetheless for your work!

luokehao (talk), 08:37, July 13, 2017 (UTC)

Presidential election results in Ohio by county, 1900

[edit]

I noticed in recent edits that that date was missing.
Here's results for that year:
Kinney, Charles (1900). Annual Report of the Secretary of State to the Governor of the State of Ohio for the year ending November 15, 1900. State of Ohio. p. 188.
Roseohioresident (talk) 03:04, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hardin County, 1912

[edit]

I'm a bit confused by the note you added here, The leading "other" candidate, Progressive Theodore Roosevelt, received 153 votes, while Socialist candidate Eugene Debs received 47 votes, Prohibition candidate Eugene Chafin received 45 votes, and Socialist Labor candidate Arthur Reimer received 5 votes. Since you listed even someone who got just 5 votes, it's clear that nobody else got 5 or more, and since these numbers make 250 votes out of the "other" total of 788, it looks like the remaining 538 votes were all spread among people who got no more than 4 votes. Clearly that's not the case (that's at least 135 people getting 1-4 votes!), so either I misunderstand somehow, or you made a mistake. Could you either explain how I'm wrong or fix your mistake? Thanks! Nyttend (talk) 23:16, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Logan County CO election results appear to be switched

[edit]

Hi friend! Thanks for adding election results to Wiki, they're pretty handy. I noticed the results on Logan County, Colorado appear to be switched, though - I _wish_ Hillary had won 75% there in 2016. I think the error is just that the party names in the table header are flipped, but I wanted to let you know in addition to one-off fixing it myself in case it's an error in a script or something you were using that day. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Logan_County,_Colorado&oldid=788134706 2600:8807:288:5300:B12A:2D26:A88C:42B3 (talk) 18:39, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, ElectionsGeek. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kentucky county 1964 results appear to be reversed

[edit]

In most Kentucky counties, there seems to be an error in the 1964 presidential election data.

For example, in Adair County, a Unionist and historically Republican county as can be seen from the adjacent election results, one sees:

Presidential elections results
Year Republican Democratic Third parties
1964 51.5% 2,854 48.2% 3,052 0.4% 21

In pro-Confederate, secessionist Calloway County, the figures shown are:

Presidential elections results
Year Republican Democratic Third parties
1964 17.7% 7,290 82.0% 1,576 0.2% 20

Would it be possible for you to kindly correct these errors?

Luokehao, 03:24 (UTC), October 9, 2018

ElectionsGeek,

The results on Dave Leip’s Atlas do match up with the results on Wikipedia, with one critical caveat:

  1. In Leip’s Atlas, the Democratic candidate (here Johnson) is listed before the Republican (here Goldwater)
  2. On the Wikipedia site, the Republican candidate is listed before the Democratic candidate
  3. Consequently, what is incorrect is that the Republican and Democratic vote totals were not reversed when reversing the percentages.

This may be a minor courtesy, but it does need correction. Luokehao, 12:13 (UTC), October 13, 2018 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.201.207.13 (talk)

Thanks for the corrections

[edit]

ElectionsGeek,

I noticed you had corrected the errors I noted previously. Thank you very much!

I do have a very minor qualm that you did not list these error corrections as minor edits, since they are “rearrangements of text without modification of its content”.

luokehao, October 15, 2018, 04:51 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, ElectionsGeek. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1982 United States Senate elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Mitchell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1956 United States Senate elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cliff Young (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1954 United States Senate elections, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Homer Ferguson and Pat McNamara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:00, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1950 United States Senate elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Benton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Love your work on this and other Senate articles!

Here are some minor formatting changes I've made. What do you think? —GoldRingChip 12:49, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Where'd you get the presidential election results for a county.

[edit]

Hello! I’m wondering where you found some county results for some past presidential elections because I’ve been adding some more results for states like Virginia, Kentucky, Tennessee, Georgia, North Carolina, Mississippi and Colorado and you stopped at 1912 for those states and I wonder where you can find results for those states from 1880 to 1908 because I saw those on Wikipedia despite Wikipedia not a good source and some users are really thinking I’m disruptive and don’t believe me. TylerKutschbach (talk) 16:57, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GAR for Denver

[edit]

Denver, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm Talk 05:21, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]